|
Che Guevara Archive
Politics
His Marxist-Leninist education, the communist party, the
battle against revisionism, his unyielding anti-imperialism and the
armed struggle.
· Marxist-Leninist
education
· The
communist party
· Battle
against revisionism
· Unyielding
anti-imperialism
· Armed
struggle
· Some
conclusions
· Footnotes
·
Marxist-Leninist education
As a 14-year old, Che Guevara read Freud, Jung and the short version
of Das Capital. Later, when he was 16-17 years old he read
the theories of Marx, Engels and Lenin.
 In
1954 he arrives in Guatemala and meets the young woman Hilda Gadea
Costa. Both have read many books on the Soviet-Union and books of
Marx, Engels and Lenin. Hilda, who had studied economy at the university,
brings Ernesto to a more systematic study. She also brings to his
notice some books on China: they reveal a whole new world for him.
During a long trip through Latin-America he was confronted with the
terrible misery of the Latino's, caused by the subjection to the imperialist
(1) countries. He was also confronted by the failure of the non-violent
resistance in Guatemala to break this subjection. It fortified the
correctness of Marx' theory in Che's mind. But above all, it was especially
the concrete experience of the Russian revolution that was the most
important school. In November 1953 he wrote in a letter from Costa
Rica:
"Once more I could convince myself how terrible
the capitalist octopuses are. I swore on a picture of our old and
bewailed comrade Stalin, I swore not to rest before these capitalist
octopuses are destroyed."
"I have travelled
through entire Latin-America and I know this continent very well.
I have seen poverty, famine, diseases, the impossibility to cure a
child because of lack of medication, the apathy and dull resignation
caused by famine and continuous oppression."
Out of his correspondence with his family and also in the works he
wrote between 1954 and 1956 one can establish how thorough and how
convincingly he dedicated himself to the systematic study of Marxism.
Especially political economics, statistics and other related disciplines.
These letters from 1956, he was barely 27 years old, give an idea
in which way the study of Marx (Che always spoke of San Carlos) changed
his medical- into a revolutionary vocation.
"I haven't
got much to tell about my life, seeing that I spent it being physician
and reading books. I think that when I leave here, I will have a suitcase
full of questions on economics, while I'll have forgotten how to take
somebody's pulse . . . It seems that my way slowly removes itself
from clinical medicine; but yet not far enough to erase my desire
for an hospital. San Carlos (Karl Marx) has gained a dedicated follower.
I'm busy changing the order of my studies: I used to devote myself
to medical studies as best as possible and spent my free time on the
study of San Carlos, without any real engagement. The new phase in
my life demands that I change that order: now San Carlos is the most
important, he is the pivot, and he will be for the years that the
earth will let me live on its exterior crust."
Che looks at the Cuban revolution as the prolongation of other communist
revolutions in the twentieth century:
"This revolution
is by some defined as the fundamental happening of Latin-America.
In order of importance it succeeds the trilogy of the Russian revolution,
the victory on the army of Hitler and the following social transformations,
and the triumph of the Chinese revolution."
^
Back To Top
· The communist party
The first three years of the Cuban revolution was characterised by
a great deal of anarchy. Che Guevara warned several time against this
anarchy.
"To avoid it there is need of an organism
that takes the lead of the revolution and guides it. That organism
is the communist party. The party is a forefront organisation. The
best workers are nominated for membership by their comrades. They
form a minority, but due to the quality of its militants the party
radiates great authority. It is our aspiration that she becomes a
mass-party, but only when the masses reach the level of consciousness
of the forefront. Meaning: when they have been reared up to communism.
That educative work is our task. The party must be the vivid example
through her militants, an example of dedication and sacrifice. Through
their efforts they have to get the masses to rise up to their revolutionary
task in turn. It will take years of heavy combat against the difficulties
that the edification of socialism will bring, against class-enemies,
against misdeeds of the past, against imperialism…In short "the
party's mission is to achieve the dictatorship of the proletariat
as soon as possible."
Che Guevara realises that the communist party is crucial for the edification
of the socialist revolution. The 'New Human Being' does not evolve
spontaneously. The capitalist awareness is tougher and harder to extinct
than a military enemy. The old habits and convictions are obstinate
and can only be got rid off through a large and severe process of
mental transformation. Besides that, imperialism will not neglect
to batter the spirits with propaganda. Finally, the rich West starts
from a principle called the 'demonstration-effect' (2) . Che sees
the ideological education as a fundamental task for the revolutionary
leadership.
"To build up communism one has to, together
with the material basis, create the 'New Human Being'. Therefore it
is very important to choose the right instruments to mobilise the
masses. Direct education through experience is most important. . .
. It has to be organised by the educational apparatus such as the
ministry of education and the party."
 Communism
will be achieved in stages. The first stage is socialism, this is
a phase of transition to communism.
"We are in .
. . the first phase on the road to communism, or in the phase of the
construction of socialism. This phase is characterised by a violent
battle between the classes and the presence of capitalist elements
in society that turbid the exact issues at stake."
What he means by that, he resumes very brief: "There is no
other valid definition of socialism to us, but to abolish the exploitation
of man by man."
^
Back To Top
· Battle against revisionism
It is not sufficient enough to have a communist party that tries to
build up a new society, there must also be an active battle against
all kinds of ideological deviations which over a long period can perpetrate
the revolution. Already in the beginning of the sixties, shortly after
Chroetsjov took power in the Soviet-Union, Che saw very clearly in
which direction it was going over there. Breaking up with the course
of Stalin would inevitable mean the destruction of the revolution
from within.
Sure, he criticised Stalin: he blamed him for organising a personality
cultus and for neglecting the communist education of the masses. Che
called it an "historic crime". But these criticisms were
not of a kind to reject the global course of Stalin, on the contrary.
He realised that the break with Stalin's policy and the attacks on
his person opened the gate to liberal and capitalist elements. And
according to Che they were the core of revisionism (3):
"In
the so called mistakes of Stalin lies the difference between a revolutionary
attitude and a revisionist attitude. You have to look at Stalin in
the historical context in which he moves, you don't have to look at
him as some kind of brute, but in that particular historical context
. . . I have come to communism because of daddy Stalin and nobody
must come and tell me that I mustn't read Stalin. I read him when
it was very bad to read him. That was another time. And because I'm
not very bright, and a hard-headed person, I keep on reading him.
Especially in this new period, now that it is worse to read him. Then,
as well as now, I still find a Seri of things that are very good."
Che saw that the revisionism of Chroetsjov was not only bad for the
Soviet-Union but also for the revolutionary movements in his continent.
Except for Colombia, all guerrilla-activities in the Latin-American
countries were condemned by Moscow. When Che started his guerrilla
in Bolivia, he was betrayed by the Bolivian CP, which lead to the
isolation and the elimination of his guerrilla force.
^
Back To Top
· Unyielding anti-imperialism
Many times Che Guevara personally experienced the brutality of imperialism.
Referring to the events in Congo and the, at that time, military interference
of the Belgians he writes in 1964:
"These events
learn us two things. First the bestiality of imperialism, that is
not bound to a particular border or a particular country. Beasts where
the Hitlertroops , as the North-Americans are beasts today, or the
Belgian elite forces in Congo, or the French mercenary troops in Algiers.
Because it is in the nature of imperialism that it makes beasts out
of men, that changes them into bloodthirsty predators, willing to
slit throats and murder. . . . "
Those who think imperialism is reconcilable with peace and democracy,
or those who have confidence in the international institutions are
mistaken, according Che.
"The statue of Lumumba
reminds us that imperialism is not to be trusted, not in the least,
not at all. (...) It was under the United-Nations flag that Lumumba
was murdered in Congo. And it are the same United-Nations that, according
to the US, should inspect our territories. The same United-Nations!"
^ Back To Top
·
Armed struggle
According to Che the only way to wipe out the bestiality of imperialism
and to end the unbearable misery of the peoples, is to pick up arms.
"We can not and may not cherish the illusion that we can
obtain freedom without battle. These battles won't be restricted to
streetfights with rocks and teargas, nor will they be peaceful general
strikes, nor will it be the battle of a furious nation that in two
or three days will have destroyed the repression apparatus of the
ruling financial oligarchy. This battle means a long war, and I repeat
it once more, a cruel war . . . "
"Hate will be
an element of the battle, a merciless hate for the enemy, that will
inspire the guerrilla-soldier to superhuman efforts of strength and
changes him into an effective, violent, selected, in cold blood killing
machine. That is how our soldiers must be; a nation without hate can
not triumph over a brute enemy."
^
Back To Top
·
Some conclusions
The ideas of Che Guevara are still valid today, more than ever so.
It is not because the revolutionary climate is less tangible than
thirty years ago that his ideas have become worthless. On the contrary.
Today a great majority of the people on this planet live in miserable
circumstances. The historical experience of the twentieth century
show that there are not too many different ways to get out of it.
The easy, so called "third way" (4) is wishful thinking
of many tired and burned out intellectuals today . They dream of a
non-violent, gradual way out of misery. But it is a phantasm, a believe
in the illusion of an 'imperialism with humane feelings'. The yearly
cost of imperialism is millions of people that starve to death or
die of sicknesses that could easily be cured.
El Salvador and Guatemala show us that armed struggle as such is no
warranty for success either. Che experienced it in person in Congo
and in Bolivia. Nicaragua learns us that a military victory does not
automatic implicate a durable victory. Cuba shows that a revolutionary
communist party is the only way that leads to a qualitative jump forward
and that such party is indispensable for the revolution to hold firm
even in the most difficult of times or situations. And it shows that
Che's ideas on revolution and socialism are no redundant theory.
 Fidel
Castro, Che and a few comrades in arms began their guerrilla in the
Sierra Maestra at a time that no one believed in victory. But Batista
had to run. Che went to Congo to fight alongside Kabila and Mulele
at a time the resistance took some devastating blows. Their battle
seemed without perspective then. Who would have believed that the
Congolese guerrilla, thirty years post-date would triumph after all?
Pessimism was unknown to Che. It's the unyielding revolutionary optimism,
averse to intellectual doubts, as well as the radical ideas that characterises
this legendary figure. The same spirit one finds in Cuba today in
spite of the extremely difficult condition, and in spite of all the
negative propaganda. Numerous times the end of this glorious revolution
was predicted. If the Cubans had the same fatalist mentality as we
in Europe often show, the island would already have been a North-American
colony long ago. The writings of Che and even more his way of live
are a perfect anti-dote against the post-modern doubts and actual
ideological confusion within the revolutionary movement and against
the capitulation and the revisionism within a great part of the left.
^ Back To Top
· Footnotes
1 Imperialism according to the conception of
Che: the highest form of development of capitalism, with the purpose
to conquer economical and political power world wide. Sometimes by
setting up a puppet government in a developing country, sometimes
through deals laid down by the International Monetary Fund or the
World Bank. That is the favourite way capitalist governments subdue
developing countries to open up their economies to the interests of
western multinational concerns. In case such countries won't keep
in line, the ultimate trick is to launch a military intervention under
the flag of the United Nations to restore "democracy" or
"human rights".
2 Promoting the
Western way of living and mass consumption to countries or individuals
that have not reached the same level. Radio, television, film, magazines,
tourism etc. are the media to achieve this. It calls on the egoism
within each individual, as opposed to Che's revolutionary moral where
the collective wellbeing is of greater importance. It demands a higher
level of consciousness to withstand the enticing adverts or propaganda
for such a way of living.
3 Is a tendency
within the socialist movement that breaks up with essential points
of the Marxist doctrine. For example the necessity for dictatorship
of the workers against financial monopolies, or the need of a planned
economy. Only a planned economy, controlled by the workers, can fulfil
the basic needs of the masses and avoid crises due to overproduction
of consumption goods.
4 Neither capitalism
nor socialism, but a 'social corrected free market economy' or 'humane
capitalism'. Adepts of this theory call on the 'universal human rights'
to bring the exploiting classes to insight and subsequently to handle
in the interests of 'all mankind'. They deny the exploited classes
the right to take up arms and fight for their rights. Instead all
social progression must come with consent of the ruling classes.
^ Back To Top
|